Who needs this solution

  • Designers, architects and engineering firms – designs for structures, utility networks, process and energy solutions;
  • construction supervision and project management – decisions that affect the cost and the schedule of a project;
  • IT companies and developers – software errors, integrations, system implementation;
  • accounting, tax and financial consultants – reports, calculations and advice with direct financial consequences;
  • legal and management consultants – opinions and recommendations that the client relies on;
  • land surveyors, experts and valuers – data and conclusions on which transactions are based.

Where PI ends and another policy begins

It is worth drawing this line straight away, because three products – PI, general civil liability and D&O – are the ones most often confused.

Which policy covers which situation
SituationWhich policyWhy
An incorrect structural calculation in a designPIFinancial loss arising from an error in professional work
A board decision that shareholders or creditors claim againstD&OAn officer's management liability, not the quality of a service
An employee damages the client's equipment on siteGeneral civil liabilityPhysical damage to someone else's property, unconnected with a professional opinion
Damage to the construction works and materials themselves on siteCAR/EARA property risk, not a liability risk
Redoing your own work after an errorUsually none; see the section on rectificationThese are performance costs, not a loss to someone else
A data breach from your systemsCyber risks; sometimes a PI extensionDepends on the policy wording

A Latvian particularity that must not be carried over from foreign material. Latvian insurance law has no separate class of professional indemnity insurance – it sits inside the general civil liability class. The practical consequence: the PI wordings of local insurers often also cover damage to health, life and property, not just purely financial loss. The statement "PI covers only financial loss" is therefore correct as a description of the product concept, but wrong as a description of a specific Latvian policy – the scope has to be read in the wording.

Claims-made and three things to understand about it

Voluntary PI cover normally operates on a claims-made basis: what matters is when the claim is brought and notified, not only when the error was made. Three practical consequences follow from this.

  • The retroactive date. It determines how far back in time errors are covered. If it coincides with the inception of the policy, every earlier project falls outside the cover.
  • Notification of circumstances. If during the policy period you notify the insurer of circumstances that may lead to a claim, a claim brought later is attributed to that policy. Failure to notify in time is the most common reason why cover disappears.
  • Run-off, or cover after activity ceases. A claims-made policy ends together with the activity. If the company is sold or wound up, or the specialist retires, past projects are left unprotected unless an extended period has been bought.

Why the retroactive date is critical for a designer

A design error does not usually come to light on the day of handover. It comes to light in operation – when a structure starts to crack, a system cannot deliver the designed capacity, or costs exceed what was calculated. Years can pass between the error and the claim, and in Latvia the time span is long: buildings have guarantee periods laid down in law for each of the building groups, while the general limitation period for claims arising from obligations under the Civil Law (Civillikums) is ten years.

The practical consequences of changing insurer. There is no law requiring a new insurer to take over the old retroactive date – the insurer has to agree to it. In cheap quotes the line "retroactive date" often shows the inception date of the policy, and that means there is no cover at all for past work. A gap between policies also resets the date. When comparing quotes, this single line is therefore worth more than the difference in premium, and "retroactive date = policy inception" is a red flag.

In construction: the statutory minimum and real cover

Compulsory civil liability insurance for construction specialists and contractors performing construction works in Latvia is governed by Cabinet Regulation No. 502 of 19 August 2014 (MK noteikumi Nr. 502), which has been in force since 1 October 2014 and has not been amended since. It is a precondition for working, and its scope is set out in the regulation itself.

Minimum liability limits under Cabinet Regulation No. 502 (verified 20 August 2026)
WhoSituationMinimum limit
Construction specialist, group 3 buildingsConstruction works contract or combined design and construction works contract10% of the total construction cost of the project, not less than EUR 150,000
Construction specialist, group 3 buildingsDesign and related services100% of the contract sum; for new buildings not less than EUR 150,000
Construction specialist, group 1 and 2 buildingsConstruction works contract10% of the total construction cost, not less than EUR 15,000
Construction specialist, group 1 and 2 buildingsDesign100% of the contract sum
Contractor performing construction works, group 3 buildingsContract with the client commissioning the works10% of the contract sum, not less than EUR 150,000
Contractor performing construction works, group 2 buildingsContract with the client commissioning the works10% of the contract sum, not less than EUR 15,000
Self-builderUntil acceptance for occupancyEUR 7,500

On top of the limits, the regulation provides for three further things that are rarely noticed in quotes: the sub-limit for damage to the environment is 25% of the total liability limit; the deductible may not exceed 20% of the liability limit; and after acceptance for occupancy the contractor's minimum limit is halved, while the maximum term of guarantee period insurance is five years.

An important asymmetry worth knowing about. Under paragraph 15 of the regulation, a construction specialist's cover applies to loss caused to other participants in the construction process and to third parties, whereas a contractor's cover under paragraph 34 applies only to third parties. That is one of the reasons why the client's property is left outside the cover of a contractor's compulsory policy; there is more on this in the article on general liability exclusions.

The compulsory minimum is nevertheless not enough for two purposes. First, the limits are linked to construction costs or to the contract sum and, on a large or technically complex project, can be many times smaller than the loss that is realistically possible. Second, a company usually does more than the scope of a construction specialist's certificate covers – project management, consulting, technical specifications, procurement documentation. A voluntary PI programme fills both of these gaps, and on large projects clients increasingly require it in the contract as well.

Which professions in Latvia must be insured

The list is longer than people usually think, and it regularly turns up companies that learn of their obligation from a client or from a supervisory authority.

Compulsory professional civil liability insurance in Latvia
WhoLegal basisMinimum sum
Construction specialists and contractors performing construction worksthe Construction Law (Būvniecības likums); Cabinet Regulation No. 502See the table above
Insurance brokersSection 28 of the Insurance and Reinsurance Distribution Law (Apdrošināšanas un pārapdrošināšanas izplatīšanas likums); EU Delegated Regulation 2024/896EUR 1,564,610 per claim and EUR 2,315,610 per year
Sworn auditorsthe Audit Services Law (Revīzijas pakalpojumu likums); Cabinet Regulation No. 432 (2025)EUR 42,700 per year for a natural person; EUR 142,300 for a company
Insolvency administrators and supervisors in legal protection proceedingsthe Insolvency Law (Maksātnespējas likums); Cabinet Regulation No. 147 (2024)60 minimum monthly wages per year
Real estate agentsthe Law on the Activities of Real Estate Agents (Nekustamā īpašuma darījumu starpnieku darbības likums); Cabinet Regulation No. 602EUR 50,000 per year
Land surveyorsCabinet Regulation No. 1011EUR 14,229 per year or 100% of the contract value
Forest inventory providersthe Forest Law (Meža likums); Cabinet Regulation No. 392EUR 14,230 per year
Sworn advocates, notaries, bailiffsSection 114 of the Advocacy Law (Advokatūras likums); the Notariate Law (Notariāta likums); the Law on Bailiffs (Tiesu izpildītāju likums)Set by the Cabinet of Ministers; to be checked case by case
Outsourced accountantsSection 38 of the Accounting Law (Grāmatvedības likums)The policy is a precondition for the licence; the sum must be checked against the current regulation
Security companiesthe Security Guard Activities Law (Apsardzes darbības likums); Cabinet Regulation No. 58At least 10% of annual turnover, with a minimum linked to the minimum monthly wage

Two frequent misunderstandings. First, there is no compulsory professional indemnity insurance for medical practitioners in Latvia – questions of patient compensation are dealt with by the Medical Treatment Risk Fund (Ārstniecības riska fonds), and a private policy is voluntary and sits above the fund. Second, the compulsory minimum is not a measure of adequacy: 15 000 or EUR 50,000 is a regulatory floor, not an assessment of the real risk.

What a standard quote often overlooks

  • The description of activities. Cover applies to the activities that have been declared. If the company has started doing something new during the year, it must be declared immediately, not at renewal – otherwise it is not only the new line of business at risk, but the validity of the whole contract, because of the duty of disclosure.
  • Assumed contractual liability. PI covers liability that would arise at law for negligence. If in a contract you sign up to an indemnity, a heightened standard of care, an extended guarantee, or waive rights of recourse, that part usually falls outside the cover. This is one of the rare cases where a signature on a contract directly reduces the value of the insurance.
  • Guaranteed results and fitness for purpose. A promise of a specific capacity, output or result is a contractual obligation, not negligence, and policies exclude it. On energy and technology projects this is the most frequent point of dispute.
  • Where defence costs sit within the limit. In Latvian PI policies they are usually included within the limit and are sub-limited as well – sometimes at a small percentage of the limit. Do not carry over from English-language material the assumption that costs are "in addition to the limit".
  • The structure of the limit. Both have to be checked: the limit of indemnity for any one claim and the aggregate limit for the period. They are not the same thing, and usually only one of them is on the first page of a quote.
  • Aggregation of related claims. Several claims arising from one cause are usually treated in the wording as a single claim. That means one deductible, but also one limit for the whole series.
  • Subcontractors' work. Some Latvian wordings exclude loss caused by engaged subcontractors entirely, others cover it on condition that the subcontractor has its own policy with a stated limit and that you do not waive rights of recourse.
  • Territory. The default in a Latvian PI policy is the territory of Latvia. Cover for the EU or for a wider territory can usually be bought, but it is a separate agreement. Two concepts also need to be kept apart: where the work is carried out, and which country's court hears the case.

Redoing your own work: exactly where the line runs

The basic principle is clear: liability insurance covers the loss your error has caused to someone else, not the cost of doing your own work correctly a second time. In Latvian wordings this is usually expressed as an exclusion of the costs of putting right defective or erroneous work.

Two qualifications make this picture usable. First, the market offers rectification costs extensions: they are sub-limited, require the insurer's prior consent, and operate only where rectification is cheaper than the claim that would otherwise arise. They are worth asking for. Second, "redoing" and "betterment" are not the same thing: betterment is that part of the value by which the result ends up better than it originally was, and it is deducted from an otherwise covered indemnity.

Decision table: what to check in a PI quote

Questions to ask before signing a policy
QuestionWhy it mattersWhat to checkThe consequence of not checking
What is the retroactive date?Errors come to light years laterWhether the new insurer takes over the old dateOld projects with no cover
Does the description of activities match reality?Cover applies to the activity declaredEvery service area and any new directionsA declined claim because of the mismatch
Does the limit match the largest project?Loss is measured against the value of the project, not the feeThe limit for any one claim and the aggregate limit separatelyThe limit does not cover a single serious case
Where do defence costs sit?They start before any judgmentWhether they are within the limit and whether there is a separate sub-limitThe limit is exhausted before the indemnity
Is subcontractors' work included?You are the one answerable to the clientThe wording and the requirements for the subcontractor's policySomeone else's error stays at your expense
What are you signing up to in the contract?Assumed liability can fall out of the coverIndemnities, guarantees, the standard of care, waiver of recourseNegligence covered, the contractual obligation not
What is the territory and the jurisdiction?The Latvian default is narrowThe territory of operation and the applicable law separatelyA foreign project outside the cover
What happens when the business ceases?A claims-made policy ends together with itThe availability, length and price of a run-off periodPast projects left unprotected

Information and documents required

  • A detailed description of activities and services
  • Annual turnover and its breakdown by type of service
  • A list of the largest projects and their value
  • The number of specialists, their certificates and qualifications
  • Standard client contracts and the liability limitations in them
  • Whether and how much work is passed to subcontractors
  • The claims and complaints history of recent years
  • The existing policy, if there is one – for carrying over the retroactive date

Typical exclusions

PI normally does not cover: deliberate breaches and fraud, the cost of redoing your own work, contractual penalties and guarantee obligations, a guaranteed result or fitness for purpose, and claims and circumstances that were known before the policy was taken out. In the best wordings the fraud exclusion has a severability provision, so cover is preserved for the partners who acted in good faith.

Fines and sanctions are uninsurable regardless of the policy text: Section 52(3) of the Insurance Contract Law (Apdrošināšanas līguma likums) provides that in civil liability insurance the indemnity does not cover a fine, a late payment charge or any other kind of sanction imposed on the insured. Paragraph two of the same Section, by contrast, permits litigation, expert examination and defence of interests costs to be covered.

How I work with professional indemnity

I start with what the company actually does and what it signs up to in its contracts – because it is precisely the mismatch between the description of activities in the policy and the actual activity that is the most common cause of a declined claim. I then review what is already covered by compulsory insurance and what is left outside it, compare quotes on substance rather than on premium alone, and pay particular attention to the retroactive date, the subcontractor wording, where defence costs sit in the structure of the limit, and liability assumed under contract. Where conditions are unclear, I ask the insurer to confirm them in writing. If a claim arises, I help with the notification and with the process through to resolution.

A practical example

A typical situation (a generalised example, not a specific client case): an engineering firm changes insurer because the new quote is cheaper. In the quote the retroactive date is the inception date of the policy, and nobody comes back to it. Eighteen months later the client brings a claim about a solution in a design handed over three years earlier. The new policy does not cover the past, the old one is no longer in force, and defence costs start immediately. Carrying over the retroactive date would in this case have cost incomparably less than the premium saving.

Frequently asked questions

How does professional indemnity insurance differ from D&O?

PI covers errors in the service the company provides – the design, the calculation, the advice, the software. D&O covers officers in their capacity as managers of the company: management decisions and liability towards shareholders, creditors and authorities. An engineering firm needs both, and one does not replace the other: a claim about a faulty design does not fall under a D&O policy, and a claim about a late insolvency application does not fall under a PI policy.

How does it differ from a company's general civil liability?

The idea is that general liability covers physical damage – damage to someone else's property and injury to health – while professional indemnity covers purely financial loss arising from an error at work, even where nothing has been damaged. In Latvia, however, this line is not sharp: since there is no separate professional indemnity class, the PI wordings of local insurers often cover damage to health and property as well. The actual scope always has to be read in the wording.

What do claims-made and the retroactive date mean in a PI policy?

The policy responds if the claim is brought and notified during its period, not at the moment the error was made. The retroactive date determines how far back in time errors are covered. Notification of circumstances matters just as much: if during the policy period you notify circumstances that may lead to a claim, a claim brought later is attributed to that policy.

Does the retroactive date carry over automatically when you change insurer?

No. There is no rule that requires it – the new insurer has to agree to take over the old date, and a gap between policies resets it. In cheaper quotes the retroactive date often coincides with the inception of the policy, which means there is no cover for any of the earlier work. I always check this before comparing prices.

Is a construction specialist's compulsory insurance enough?

It is a minimum laid down in law, not a measure of the company's risk. Cabinet Regulation No. 502 links the limits to construction costs or to the contract sum with a monetary floor – EUR 150,000 for group 3 buildings, EUR 15,000 for groups 1 and 2 – and on a large project that can be many times less than the loss that is realistically possible. Compulsory insurance also applies to the specific duties of a construction specialist, not to the whole range of the company's services.

Does the policy cover redoing my own work?

In principle no: liability insurance covers the loss your error has caused to someone else, not the cost of doing your own work a second time. The market does, however, offer rectification costs extensions – they are sub-limited, require the insurer's prior consent, and operate where rectification is cheaper than the claim that would otherwise arise. They are worth asking for at the quote stage.

Does a PI policy cover errors made by subcontractors?

That depends on the wording, and in Latvia the differences are large: some wordings exclude loss caused by engaged subcontractors entirely, others cover it on condition that the subcontractor has its own policy with a stated limit and that you do not waive rights of recourse. If you buy the design element in from outside, this is one of the first points I check.

What happens to the cover if the company ceases trading?

A claims-made policy ends together with the activity, so after a sale of the company, a liquidation or a specialist's departure, past projects are left unprotected unless run-off cover has been bought. In Latvia the reference points for the length of the period are both the guarantee periods for buildings and the ten-year limitation period for claims arising from obligations under the Civil Law (Civillikums), so a short run-off period does not cover the whole time during which a claim is still possible.

Kristaps Račko

Insurance broker, partner at SIA EURORISK. 18+ years in insurance. About me →

Methodology and sources

The regulatory part is based on the legislation in force and was verified on 20 August 2026. The minimum sums insured are set out in legislation and some of them are linked to the minimum monthly wage or to the contract sum, so they change – check the current wording before relying on any particular figure. The practical observations are Kristaps Račko's professional observations from broker practice; no data on specific clients or policies has been used. The actual cover always depends on the terms of the chosen insurer and on the special conditions of the policy.

Author: Kristaps Račko, insurance broker (partner at SIA EURORISK) Published: Last reviewed:

This page provides general information about professional indemnity insurance and is not individual insurance advice. Actual cover always depends on the chosen insurer's wording, the special conditions in the policy and your situation – we will assess those together before any decision.

Related solutions